Apple M4 vs Intel Lunar Lake: Benchmark Comparison
Nov. 29, 2024We recently benchmarked and compared theApple M4 with the Snapdragon X Eliteand found that Apple’s latest M-series chipset outperforms Qualcomm’s PC processor. In this article, we have compared the Apple M4 with Intel’s Lunar Lake processor to check which chipset offers the best performance. For testing, we used the Apple M4 Mac Mini andAsus Zenbook S 14, powered by the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V processor. On that note, let’s dive in.
Apple M4 vs Intel Lunar Lake: Specs Comparison
In our first Geekbench 6 CPU test, the 10-core Apple M4 CPU delivers remarkable performance. It scores 3,781 in single-core and 14,858 in multi-core. In comparison, Intel’s Lunar Lake processor aka the 8-core Core Ultra 7 258V achieves 2,640 points in single-core and 10,754 in multi-core. Despite running the CPU at higher clock speeds, Intel couldn’t match Apple’s CPU performance.
In single-core tasks, the Apple M4 CPU is around 43% faster than the Lunar Lake CPU. And in multi-core tasks, the M4 CPU leads by 38%. While the x86-based Lunar Lake CPU is not bad, the Arm-based M4 CPU is in a different league altogether, both in terms of performance and efficiency.Geekbench 6 CPUApple M4 (Base)Intel Lunar Lake(Core Ultra 7 258V)Single-core3,7812,640Multi-core14,85810,754
In the Geekbench 6 GPU test, the 10-core Apple M4 GPU scores 38,006 points while using the OpenCL API and the 8-core Intel Arc 140V GPU achieves 27,068 points on the same graphics API. In graphics performance, the M4 GPU delivers 40% faster performance than the Lunar Lake GPU.
On Apple’s own Metal API, the M4 GPU delivers superior performance, achieving a score of 58,082 points. On the Vulkan API, the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V GPU also does better and gets 37,096 points, but it’s still significantly behind the M4 GPU.Geekbench 6 GPUApple M4 (Base)Intel Lunar Lake(Core Ultra 7 258V)OpenCL38,00627,068VulkanNA37,096Metal58,082NA
In the graphics-intensive 3DMark Wild Life Extreme test, the M4 GPU gets 9,807 points whereas the Lunar Lake GPU gets 7,480 points. Basically, the M4 GPU is around 31% faster than the Intel Arc 140V GPU. However, in the Solar Bay test that evaluates the ray-tracing capability, the Lunar Lake processor does 5% better, scoring 15,152 points, and the M4 GPU achieves 14,312 points.3DMarkApple M4 (Base)Intel Lunar Lake(Core Ultra 7 258V)Wild Life Extreme9,807 / 58.7 FPS7,480 / 44.79 FPSSolar Bay14,31215,152
Next, in the Geekbench AI test which evaluates theNPU/Neural Engine, the 16-core Apple M4 Neural Engine hits it out of the park. Be it Single precision, Half precision, or Quantized data types, the M4 Neural Engine delivers 60% to 80% faster performance than the Intel NPU on AI workloads.
Finally, in the browser benchmark Speedometer 3.0 test, the Apple M4 gets 33.2 points whereas the Intel Lunar Lake processor achieves 25.5 points. In this test, the M4 processor leads by 30%. Basically, for a fluid and responsive web browsing experience, the Apple M4 is better than the Lunar Lake chipset.
It’s evidently clear that the Apple M4 chipset is miles ahead of Intel Lunar Lake aka the 2nd-gen Core Ultra processor. The M4 CPU offers lightning-fast performance, and the GPU delivers impressive graphics performance. The Neural Engine is again pretty solid. And all of this is done efficiently at lower clock speeds and power consumption.
While the Apple M4 chipset is indeed very powerful, Intel’s unique Lunar Lake processor should not be dismissed. After a long wait, Intel has developed an efficient x86 processor, putting the CPU, GPU, and NPU on a single compute tile. Not to mention, just like Apple’s M-series processors, it comes with on-package memory and is fabricated on TSMC’s 1st-gen 3nm process node.
In ourIntel Lunar Lake vs Snapdragon X Elitecomparison, we noted that Intel’s latest processor rivals Qualcomm’s PC chipset in battery life. It means that x86 chipsets can be designed for efficiency and Intel should continue the new design.
That said, new reports suggest that Intel might not move forward with the Lunar Lake design. In that case, we will have to see how the company tunes the processor for efficiency. To conclude, the Intel Lunar Lake chipset is quite promising, but it can’t match the Apple M4 in terms of performance or efficiency.
Passionate about Windows, ChromeOS, Android, security and privacy issues. Have a penchant to solve everyday computing problems.
